Skip to content
The Valley is a wide area ringed by the Santa Monica Mountains to the South, the Verdugo Mountains and San Gabriel Mountains to the East, the Simi Hills to the West, and the Santa Susana Mountains to the North.

Though the Valley developed as a suburban, garden-home style fabric and generally maintains its low density, it is rapidly urbanizing as single-family homes are converted into multi-family developments. Even with some of the most expensive neighborhoods and enclaves, the Valley is generally considered more affordable than many other parts of the City with a slower pace and a rich sense of community.

The Valley includes some of the City’s largest and most popular recreation areas including the Hansen Dam Recreation Area, Runyon Canyon, and Griffith Park, as well as regional facilities such as the Sepulveda Basin Recreation Area. It also includes many well-loved neighborhood park spaces such as the North Hollywood Recreation Center, Reseda Park, and Limekiln Canyon Park.

Though the Valley has many acres of parkland, there are issues around access to and interconnectivity of parks. Parks are quite far from some residents, leading to a need for better trails and enhanced streetscapes to connect parks and greenspaces. There is also a need for more accessible routes and facilities within parks.

Ongoing Council District Initiatives

Council Districts in the Valley have varied relationships to their infrastructure and parks.

In Council District 2, parks symbolize stability and are seen as providing critical social services, such as childcare, capacity for disaster response, as well as services for the unhoused community.

Council District 3 includes the future site of the Warner Center planned development. Community members have expressed concerns about park density and pressure in response to future densification and development.

In Council District 4, Griffith Park is undergoing renovations to roads and transit access. In the wake of recent regional fires, attention in Council District 4 is turning towards resiliency to fire risk and climate vulnerability in neighborhoods and parks. Council District 4 is also interested in expanding programs within their park spaces and understanding broader trends of amenities and usership for community members.

In Council District 6, there is a focus on prioritizing infrastructure including transit, street repairs, and energy-related infrastructure. This district includes the 1,500-acre Sepulveda Basin Recreation Area, which RAP leases from the US Army Corps of Engineers. A vision plan for the basin, completed in 2023 with support from Council Districts 4 and 6, outlines a cohesive, multi-benefit framework for the basin over the next 25 years. In anticipation of hosting several Olympic competitions in 2028, existing park spaces will be upgraded and new trails and facilities will be added.

Council Districts 7 and 12 include robust equestrian communities. In Council District 7, expanded safety and trails for horses are being constructed, and grants are funding the construction of new parks and playground upgrades.

Summary of Key Issues and Engagement Findings

Community members in the Valley have raised concerns about safety and maintenance in parks. Resilience is another key theme among Valley neighborhoods. During the COVID pandemic, many Valley parks were used as safe testing and vaccination locations.

During extreme heat advisories, many residents turn to aquatic facilities, water features like splash pads, and air conditioned recreation centers to cool off. Parks in this region are seen by residents as resilience assets that help keep them safe, stable, and healthy.

Rapid urbanization is also a concern in the Valley. As areas that were historically made up of single family homes with private yards become more dense, the region’s parks are facing increased pressure.

Popular Parks in Valley

At a Glance

131
City Parks
1606.6303242315396
Acres of Parkland
1536275
Resdients
506
Sports Fields and Courts
176
Playgrounds
59
Recreation & Community Centers
24
Pools & Splashpads
31%
Average Canopy Coverage in Parks

Top 3 Languages Spoken

English, Spanish, Other Indo-European

$91231
Median Household Income
$81173
Citywide
202762
Median Household Income
624523
Citywide
39.3
Median Household Income
37.5
Citywide

What we heard

...I also wish we could have parks that were meant to benefit people in the community rather than as a way to gentrify areas which ultimately displaces people instead of improving their access to parks.
...Making friends in the community is so important.
Support parks equally. If the parks in poorer neighborhoods had the same care and put into them as the more affluent parks, it would be a huge difference. Our poor parks are used, i just hate that I have to worry about my children’s physical safety.
Favorite Memory: 'Leading birdwalk with an arts group in the Sepulveda Basin Wildlife Area...'

Current and Future Needs: Survey Results

Valley region respondents feel worse than the city as a whole about the physical condition of City of LA parks and recreation centers.

Parks
Recreation Centers

Fewer than half of Valley region respondents feel that there are enough parks and recreation centers within walking distance of their homes.

Most Valley region respondents visit a City of LA park at least once a month, while only a little more than half have visited a City of LA recreation center.

  • false%Have Visited
  • %Have Not Visited
  • Support parks equally. If the parks in poorer neighborhoods had the same care and put into them as the more affluent parks, it would be a huge difference. Our poor parks are used, i just hate that I have to worry about my children’s physical safety.
    Favorite Memory: 'Leading birdwalk with an arts group in the Sepulveda Basin Wildlife Area...'
    %
    Have Visited
  • %Have Not Visited

A little over half of Valley residents support a bond, levy, or tax to fund parks and recreation facilities.

Top 3 Most Important...

Outdoor Facilities

Indoor Facilities

Programs

Top barriers to visiting parks and recreation centers more often:

50%
People experiencing homelessness there
33%
Too far from our residence
33%
Do not know where to go/what is offered
32%
Facilities are not well-maintained
Sign Up for Project Updates

Translate This Site
Follow Us
Back To Top